Thursday, 23 February 2023

Israel to ditch the hated sugar tax


The Israeli government is abolishing its sugar tax after barely a year, following the lead of Denmark, Norway, Chicago and other places around the world where the public have seen through this regressive tax grab. Like many such taxes, it wasn't really a sugar tax at all as it also applied to artificially sweetened beverages. It was just a money-grabbing shake-down.

An op-ed in The Lancet offers a chance for us to bathe in nanny statists' tears, so let's turn on the taps.
 
As members of the World Federation of Public Health Associations Non-Communicable Diseases Prevention & Health Promotion and Policy Working Groups...
 
Snappy name!
 
... and other leading scholars of nutrition policy, health sciences, and economics, we would like to convey extreme concern over the Israeli Finance Minister's decision to revoke the sweetened beverage tax as his first act on his first day in office.
 
Not just concern, but extreme concern! 
 
This decision, taken without consulting the civil service professionals in the ministries of health or finance, or without conducting any other independent expert review, is a grievous blow to public health. 
 
Imagine taking a decision based on what you promised in a recent election rather than doing what 'civil service professionals' want you to do. How grievous!
 
It runs counter to clear guidance from international agencies such as WHO and The World Bank...
 
Why does the World Bank have a corporate view on sweetened beverage taxes?
 
... as well as evidence from the Bank of Israel itself, showing that the tax substantially reduced sweetened beverage consumption.
 
I'm not sure why the Bank of Israel got involved, but we know from many other jurisdictions that a reduction in sugary drink consumption does not typically lead to a reduction in overall sugar consumption, let alone calorie consumption, and that sugar taxes have never been accompanied by a decline in obesity.
 
Revoking the tax will undoubtedly harm lives and increase the direct and indirect economic costs to Israel's health system and economy, both in the short term and long term.
 
Codswallop on stilts. Cry more.
 
More broadly, this act undermines hard won progress made elsewhere around the world. 
 
Good! This must explain why eight of the nine authors of this tear-stained tract are based in Geneva, Britain or the USA and only one is in Israel itself. It's no surprise to see Barry Popkin's name among them. Popkin has been campaigning for soda taxes longer than anyone and his name appears on a whole bunch of studies spuriously claiming that a soda tax has 'worked' somewhere or other, such as Berkeley, Mexico and Chile, usually in the journal PLoS One which he happens to be on the board of.
 
It is a serious setback for evidence-based public health policy and will be celebrated by vested interests who promote their products and disregard the need for policies that uphold the public's health and welfare.
 
It will also be celebrated by consumers in Israel, most of whom did not want the tax in the first place, and by people like me who just enjoy watching 'public health' hucksters throwing their toys out of the pram. 
 
This decision will be seen as prioritising sectorial political interests over incontrovertible scientific evidence and public health best practice. 
 
Bloody democracy, eh?
 
This decision seriously tarnishes Israel's international standing, its medical, scientific, and technological leadership, and reputation as an exemplar of sensible, evidence-based policy.
 
It really doesn't.
 
We support our colleagues in the Israeli health professions and society at large in calling on the Government of Israel to reconsider and retract this ill-conceived and hasty decision. Instead, let the revenue from the soda tax be used to combat chronic diseases including obesity, as well as promote nutrition security by increasing economic access to healthy diets, narrowing health disparities, improving the health and welfare of all Israeli citizens, and setting an example for world health leadership.
 
It's not leadership if you're just copying what lots of other countries have already done, is it? If anything Israel is showing leadership by standing up for the people against grubby 'public health' killjoys.  

If you want more tax revenue for healthcare, there are better ways of getting it. Sugar taxes have never worked anywhere in the world, they weren't going to work in Israel and the sooner other countries get rid of them, the better.


Wednesday, 22 February 2023

Pro-death, anti-choice lobby sides with the earthquake

I mentioned earlier how little use 'public health professionals' were during the pandemic.  
 
Let's not forget that these 'public health' academics spent the only genuine public health crisis of their lifetimes complaining about pubs being used as vaccination centres and whining about businesses donating food to the hungry and medical equipment to hospitals. Rarely has the chasm between public health and 'public health' been illustrated so starkly.

I had barely pressed 'publish' when I saw this story about anti-smoking activists trying to get the Turkish government to turn down a €1.8 million donation from Phillip Morris International for humanitarian aid after the recent earthquake.
 
Activists fume at tobacco industry for donating to earthquake-hit Turkey

The European anti-tobacco lobby has urged the international community to help earthquake-hit Turkey avoid a €1.8 million donation from Phillip Morris International (PMI) highlighting “hidden” lobbying activities. For its part, PMI rejected the accusations saying it’s money to help people in need.

On 15 February, PMI offered €1.8 million “to support immediate humanitarian aid and long-term recovery assistance” after an earthquake hit Turkey and neighbouring Syria causing thousands of deaths.

However, the move triggered a strong reaction from the anti-tobacco lobby.

 
What is this lobbying and how does this group know about it if it is hidden? No details are forthcoming in the article. Is it possible that these people are saying the first thing that comes to their head again?

“The tobacco control community in Turkey is concerned about the recent corporate social responsibility launch by Phillip Morris International about extending earthquake aid to Turkey”, Dr Elif Daglu from the Turkish Coalition on Tobacco or Health to the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP) said in a statement.


Yes, that's the real concern in Turkey at the moment, isn't it? The word you're looking for, Dr Elif, is "thank you".
 
PMI employs a lot of people in Turkey and has a lot of money. It is understandable and commendable that it is helping the relief effort. What, I wonder, is the 'tobacco control community' doing to help?
 

Such donations from the tobacco industry constitute a breach of Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, to which Turkey is a party, he added.

 
That is just a lie. Why is that people who have made a career out of hating smokers are able to lie with impunity?

Contacted by EURACTIV, ENSP Secretary General Cornel Radu-Loghin said Turkish citizens “asked our organisation and other organisations to do whatever is possible to convince the Turkish government not to accept the tobacco industry money”.

 
Imagine being such a wretched human being that you spend your time trying to prevent humanitarian relief after an earthquake. It's difficult to think of a way of sinking any lower and yet this - for want of a better word - person is proud of it.
 

ESNP encourages the public health community to donate to the WHO foundation and the BTF relief fund, managed by the Turkish diaspora.


But they won't, will they? They will expect the government to do it for them, as usual.
 

ENSP claims that PMI and other tobacco industry organisations are using their social responsibility programmes, including donations, to lobby governments and to “clean their image”.

 
As with the generosity of the food, alcohol and tobacco industries during the pandemic, the only time we hear about these donations is when moral busybodies go to the media to whine about them. If it's a way of "cleaning their image", it is one that relies on 'public health' bottom-feeders publicising it. If it wasn't for them, no one would ever hear about these acts of charity!
 

“PMI and others are conducting an intensive campaign to legalise the sales and marketing, as well as probably their manufacturing, of novel tobacco and nicotine products in the Turkish market,” ESNP said.


It is no surprise that these parasitic fanatics are opposed to safer alternatives to smoking. Pro-earthquake and pro-smoking. It's all in a day's work for them.
 
E-cigarettes and heated tobacco are banned outright in Turkish thanks to these people. Turkey was supposed to be the golden boy of tobacco control. It did everything the WHO wanted and even got a WHO award for tobacco control, but it has all been a miserable failure. And smokers who want to switch to a vastly safer alternative are banned from doing so.

Way to go, guys! Which pro-death policy will you be adopting next?


No fat left to trim? The case of SPECTRUM

Back in 2019, I mentioned SPECTRUM which is, preposterously, meant to be an acronym for Shaping Public hEalth poliCies To Reduce ineqUalities and harM. At the time it was a new organisation that had just received £5.9 million from the unwitting taxpayer...

The Economic and Social Research Council is funded to the tune of £212 million by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. In 2017, it announced the creation of the UK Prevention Research Partnership (UKPRP), a £50 million project aimed at developing ‘robust new knowledge which contributes to demonstrable changes in policy and practice’ by ‘working closely with policy makers'. 
 
I suggested in Still Hand In Glove? that this had the hallmarks of another slush fund for political pressure groups. Some news yesterday removed all doubt...

We are delighted to announce that UKCTAS has been successful in securing future funding through a multi-funder research initiative; the UK Prevention Research Partnership (UKPRP). UKTCAS academics joined forces with new collaborators and a range of public and private sector organisations to apply to the UKPRP. The new consortium has now been awarded £5.9 million funding over five years and is called SPECTRUM (Shaping Public hEalth poliCies To Reduce ineqUalities and harM).
 
A few months later, another new 'public health' organisation - called SIPHER - was set up and given £4.9 million of our money. After years of so-called 'austerity', there is was supposed to be no fat left to trim and yet the gravy train rolled on for the nanny state industry.
 
As I said at the time, SPECTRUM is a shameless slush fund for the worst people in the anti-capitalist, anti-freedom, authoritarian 'public health' racket. 
 
The list of SPECTRUM's 'co-investigators' features some other familiar faces, including John Britton (director of UKCTAS), Alan Brennan (Sheffield University fantasy modeller), Anna Gilmore (Tobacco Tactics conspiracy theorist) and Mark Petticrew (anti-alcohol crank), plus two senior staff from Public Health England.
 
I was reminded of them yesterday when they produced a video that they would call 'slick' if one of the many industries they hate had produced it. There is barely any attempt to pretend that they are not political activists.
 
 
 
As you'll see if you have the stomach to watch it, the video makes it clear that all you have to do is make a reference to 'health inequalities' and the government will shower you with cash to further your puritanical agenda. Presumably, we are supposed to be appalled by the behaviour we see in the animation, such as a couple relaxing in a cocktail bar, a man standing outside a bus shelter, in the rain, smoking a cigarette, and two people talking about tobacco and fast food.


Let's not forget that these 'public health' academics spent the only genuine public health crisis of their lifetimes complaining about pubs being used as vaccination centres and whining about businesses donating food to the hungry and medical equipment to hospitals. Rarely has the chasm between public health and 'public health' been illustrated so starkly.
 
They didn't allow themselves to be distracted by COVID-19. Apart from a few articles spreading doubt about the protective effect of smoking and a long rant about the help provided by 'unhealthy commodity industries', they have spent the last few years watching TV, scouring Twitter and responding to every government consultation they can find.

Since 2020, their published work includes the following indispensable contributions to the scientific literature.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Many of these 'studies' involve the ludicrous Mark Petticrew. That SPECTRUM is helping this buffoon pay his mortgage is reason enough to defund it. 
 
I am at a loss to see how taking millions of pounds from taxpayers and giving it to these juvenile quackademics can ever be justified. The government is burning our money. In fact, it would be better to literally burn the money that to spend it on this drivel.


Tuesday, 21 February 2023

Accolades for Aseem

Book early to ensure disappointment

Aseem Malhotra has gone all the way down the rabbit hole in the last year and is off the South Africa to spread his anti-vax messsage, having done likewise in India recently. The GMC say they won't investigate him because the vast majority of the British public have already been vaccinated and so the damage he can do to public health is limited. This is surely less convincing as an excuse for inaction when it comes to less vaccinated parts of the world. In any case, Malhotra is deliberately undermining confidence in mRNA technology in general, not just Covid vaccines.

Be that as it may, it is grimly amusing to see the flyer above using adoring quotes from people who fell for his low carb schtick back in the day. I wonder how anti-vaping fanatic Simon Capewell, anti-sugar zealot Robert Lustig and government-loving libertarian Shami Chakrabarti feel about their names being used to promote Malhotra's latest quackery?

It's a shame that there was no room on the flyer to quote Action on Sugar who worked out seven years ago that Malhotra was "completely mad", albeit only in relation to his views on statins and fat. Getting kicked out of Action on Sugar for being mad is like being kicked out of the KKK for being bigoted. But even they could see the signs.  

The signs were there from the very start. People in 'public health' didn't see them for the same reason they didn't spot that David Miller was a wrong 'un - they told them what they wanted to hear and so many cranks and conspiracy theorists work in 'public health' that it is easy for such people to hide in plain sight.



Monday, 20 February 2023

The sugar tax didn't work


The Mail on Sunday published a nice article this weekend looking at the sugar tax. It's refreshing to see a newspaper asking whether current policies are working rather than agitating for the next 'clamp down'.

It follows Israel's decision to repeal its tax on sugary drinks, something that Norway, Denmark and several US states and counties have already done. 'Public health' activist-academics from the World Federation of Public Health Associations Non-Communicable Diseases Prevention & Health Promotion and Policy Working Groups (snappy name!) are naturally appalled, but it seems unlikely that anyone is going to die as a result.

Alongside a number of quotes from my good self, the Mail on Sunday article includes some insights from Tom Sanders, professor emeritus of nutrition and dietetics at King’s College London:
 
Prof Sanders says: ‘The idea behind the tax was right, but I think it’s dishonest to say it works.’

He says that data from the Government’s National Diet And Nutrition Survey showed the number of children who report having sugary drinks was already falling by five per cent annually from 2008 onwards – ten years before the tax. There is ‘no evidence’ the sugar tax has accelerated that.

‘A study looked at the impact of introducing minimum unit pricing for alcohol in Scotland. They thought the policy would have a beneficial effect, but heavy drinkers just spent more money on alcohol.

‘Will a broader tax on food work now, when so much is going up in price? Will people eat less, eat better, or consume fewer calories? I suspect they will just spend more of their disposable income on food, rather than cut back.'

 
I was also on the Medical Minefield podcast discussing this. Listen here. It features someone from Action on Sugar who pretty much admits the sugar tax hasn't worked but supports it anyway (which is Giles Yeo's view in the article too).
 

 


Friday, 17 February 2023

A swift half with Zion Lights

A new Swift Half has dropped and I'm delighted to say that Zion Lights was my guest. Formerly of the Green Party and Extinction Rebellion, Zion had a change of heart after an awkward interview with Andrew Neil in which she was expected to stand by some of XR's wilder claims. She now campaigns for nuclear power. Don't miss this one.




Thursday, 16 February 2023

Supernanny Sturgeon

Farewell then, Nicola Sturgeon. You put Scotland on international 'public health' map, but for all the wrong reasons, as I explain in the Scottish Daily Express today...
 

At every turn, Sturgeon and her government have preferred eye-catching gestures to effective health policies. Rather than address the root causes of alcoholism, obesity and drug addiction, they have opted for punitive and performative measures designed to set Scotland apart from England.

Sturgeon’s approach to Covid-19 amounted to clinging onto lockdowns and face-masks for longer than was sensible or necessary. Every time Boris Johnson relaxed restrictions, she would make a show of keeping them for a wee while longer.

This was supposed to make it look like Sturgeon cared more about people’s health than the Tories did. In truth, it made no difference to anyone’s health and made Scotland look like a laggard.

Without Sturgeon, the SNP has an opportunity to stop Scotland being a testbed for ill-advised nanny state ideas. There is nothing about the cause for Scottish independence that requires its supporters to be puritanical killjoys. 

 
 
One of the advantages of making your country a guinea pig for illiberal nanny state policies is that you are almost guaranteed a well paid job in the 'public health' racket once you leave front line politics. Jane Ellison (remember her?) has been at the WHO ever since she introduced plain packaging in the UK. Gro Harlem Brundtland became director-general of the WHO as a reward for her anti-smoking activism when she was Norway's prime minister.

Sturgeon is already on Mike Bloomberg's Task Force on Fiscal Policy for Health along with former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark. If she does step away from politics, don't bet against her becoming a super-nanny globetrotter for Bloomberg, the WHO or the Global Alcohol Policy Alliance.