The new Nanny State Index was published in May, bigger and better than ever. Next month sees the Nanny State Index conference. It's in Brussels and free tickets are available to anyone who registers.
There will be a keynote speech at 9am followed by three panel discussions and a lunch. Needless to say, I will be there. Join us if you can.
The panel discussions are:
09.30 – 10.30: Benign paternalism across the EU: does the end justify the means?
Many European countries implemented sugar taxes, plain packing of
tobacco products, and other policies that claim to improve the health of
their citizens. What are the outcomes of these policies; did life
expectancy improve faster in countries with stricter lifestyle
regulations than in the countries without such restrictions? Did junk
food consumption decrease as a result of the ‘fat tax’ in Hungary or
Denmark? Do nations consume less alcohol where minimum pricing and/or
high sin taxes were implemented? This panel reviews with local decision
makers and public policy experts, how the intended and unintended
consequences of lifestyle regulations have been realized.
10.50 – 11.50: Whose responsibility?
Paying more attention to health and well-being has been both a
priority for the political and the corporate sector. Now, more than
ever, there is increased attention to provide healthier alternatives in
all sectors. Who bears the primary responsibility for improving health
outcomes of individuals? Do policy makers on the regional, national, or
EU-level have a duty of care? What are the responsibilities of
corporates, when it comes to providing healthier alternatives or
discontinuing certain products? Should there be a focus on individuals
and their particular lifestyle choices? If so, are there clear lines,
between benevolent nudging towards certain choices, and arbitrary
limitations on the freedom of choice?
12.10 – 13.10: Overregulation & the shadow economy
Regulations often have unintended consequences which were never the
aim of policy makers in the first place. Unrealistically high tax rates,
bans, and other restrictions on consumer choice push a certain segment
of consumption from the legal and regulated area into illegality.What are the concrete impacts of such regulatory policies on the shadow economy? What plays a more important role in fighting the shadow economy – levels of taxation, the amount of regulation, public perception, detection & penalties, or the income level of citizens? New empirical research from the Lithuanian Free Market Institute provides unique evidence of the actual drivers of the shadow economy and a comprehensive cross-country perspective.
Speakers to be confirmed.
No comments:
Post a Comment