The interview with Glantz reminded me of one of those consumer affairs programmes, such as Watchdog, where the investigative journalist finally catches up with the boss of a fly-by-night building company that has been filmed ripping off customers. All bluff and bluster. I wouldn't be surprised if the interview was cut short after Glantz suddenly remembered an important meeting he had to go to.
After waffling on about the fictitious 'gateway effect' and asserting that vaping is 'as bad as smoking a cigarette' for cardiovascular health, Glantz attacks his old colleague Michael Siegel. Without a hint of irony, Glantz says that Siegel has 'lost all credibility as a scientist'. This is followed by an amusing exchange in which the fat mechanic projects all his failings onto Siegel:
Glantz: One thing that strikes me is that any research which supports his preordained position is good no matter how bad it is, and anything that doesn't is bad no matter how good it is.
Q: Is that the same for you?
Glantz: No, no, no.
Q: What bit of research recently has upended a few of your assumptions about e-cigarettes?
Glantz: Er, about e-cigarettes... er... nothing has come out that has - but I...
Q: But there's a bunch of stuff that has come out that disagrees with you.
Glantz: I'm not, I'm not... no, no.
Q: Yes, of course there is!
The whole thing is quite entertaining so have a watch of it below.