That study is not the official reason for his dismissal—he has recently been studying air pollution—but it seems that it has cast a long shadow:
Beate Ritz, a leading air pollution scientist with UCLA who works in the Epidemiology Department, did respond.
She said she hadn't read Enstrom's 2005 study on air pollution.
But, based on his 2003 findings that second-hand cigarette smoke doesn't kill people, she said she knows him "for letting his interpretations go beyond the data and his personal biases to be strong enough to not allow for a balanced and appropriately cautious interpretation of the numbers."
Her attitude wasn't surprising to Enstrom, who said his 2003 paper, published in the British Medical Journal, was widely attacked.
"Not a single error was ever identified in that paper and I refuted all claims made against me and my research," he said. "My work isn't about being politically correct, it's about honest research and being faithful to the science."
Frankly, I don't know what's been going on. The news is here and Carl V. Phillips has this to say. Please read both.
"... for letting his interpretations go beyond the data ..."
ReplyDeleteA twisted world ...
Dr. Enstrom happened to find that there was no significant relationship between PM2.5 exposure and overall mortality, at least during the time period 1983-2002.
ReplyDeleteAnother insignificant health threat finding...........what the nazis are really worried about is they're own job security.........with results like this,there is no reason to have a public health science dept.........I hope dr enstrom now goes on tour putting these nazis in there place and all the other scientists who have been afraid to speak up will now do so and put anti-everything in the nanny state OUT OF BUSINESS!
HARLEYRIDER1978