tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3585028625507474093.post6650269494368397526..comments2023-10-17T15:56:22.827+01:00Comments on Velvet Glove, Iron Fist: A real scientist speaksChristopher Snowdonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15963753745009712865noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3585028625507474093.post-85138810630485762482012-03-06T00:26:16.443+00:002012-03-06T00:26:16.443+00:00Now is the time to take these Tobacco Control nuts...Now is the time to take these Tobacco Control nuts to Court as individuals and hear what they have to say under oath.<br /><br />Sue them for every penny.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3585028625507474093.post-7197723793975286572012-03-05T20:15:11.256+00:002012-03-05T20:15:11.256+00:00After careful study of particpants it was discover...After careful study of particpants it was discovered the positive group that starred at warning labels the longest had ''LAZY EYE''<br /><br />It is with great sorrow we admit stacking the study with select individuals with this abnormality.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3585028625507474093.post-54707292412560718352012-03-05T18:09:30.463+00:002012-03-05T18:09:30.463+00:00This issue has been settled.
Advertising/pretty p...This issue has been settled.<br /><br />Advertising/pretty packages can not be proven in a court of law to cause people to start smoking nor is tobacco more addictive than cocaine.<br /><br />Gary K.<br /><br />http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2005CSOH69.html#Preliminaries<br />OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION<br /><br /><br />[2005] CSOH 69 <br /><br /> OPINION OF LORD NIMMO SMITH<br /><br /><br />in the cause<br /><br /><br />MRS MARGARET McTEAR<br /><br /><br />Pursuer;<br /><br /><br />against<br /><br /><br />IMPERIAL TOBACCO LIMITED<br /><br /><br />Defenders <br /> <br /> <br />PART IX: CONCLUSIONS AND RESULT<br /><br />Conclusions<br /><br />[9.1] I now set out my main conclusions, which should be read in conjunction with the passages of discussion to which cross-references are given. <br /><br />[9.3] Mr McTear started smoking no earlier than 1964. I am satisfied that advertising had nothing to do with his reasons for starting to smoke.(para.[4.226]).<br /><br />[6.208]). The averment that tobacco is more addictive than cocaine is not proved.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3585028625507474093.post-36738049036759728022012-03-05T18:05:04.818+00:002012-03-05T18:05:04.818+00:00I'm confused. Have I missed something? Why wou...I'm confused. Have I missed something? Why would non smokers 'linger' on a packet of fags? I don't generally look at something I don't want. What form of perverted logic concludes that this will have an effect on smokers? What's any of it got to bleeding well do with plain packaging?<br /><br />My head hurts. It must be me.Frank Jnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3585028625507474093.post-21961902838537597122012-03-05T17:11:45.991+00:002012-03-05T17:11:45.991+00:00"Ooh, who to trust?"
It's a toughie..."Ooh, who to trust?"<br /><br />It's a toughie...<br /><br />Notwithstanding that, I wouldn't have thought that in the real world, non-smokers really get the chance to gawp at health warnings on packs, plain or otherwise.<br /><br />JayAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3585028625507474093.post-52549570523887647352012-03-05T16:02:12.839+00:002012-03-05T16:02:12.839+00:00Well of course it goes without saying that the gov...Well of course it goes without saying that the government will listen to he who shouts loudest and longest. And the antis are in the habit of screaming unrelentingly.<br /><br />Anyway, any studies are irrelevant. They decided a while back that they'd force plain packaging on us, consultations notwithstanding. <br /><br />Another classic case of deciding on the answer before asking the question. Your excellent appraisal for the ASI will be roundly ignored, as will any other information that doesn't concur with the tobacco demonisation agenda.nisakimannoreply@blogger.com